A diver bounces on a 3-meter springboard. Up she goes. A somersault, a twist, then whoosh, into the water. This table shows the diver’s height as a function of time:
\(T\) |
0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
\(H\) |
3.00 |
3.88 |
4.38 |
4.48 |
4.20 |
3.52 |
2.45 |
1.00 |
where
\begin{align*}
H \amp= \text{ diver's height (meters) } \sim \text{ dep} \\
T \amp= \text{ time (seconds) } \sim \text{ indep}
\end{align*}
In case you’re wondering, 3 meters is nearly 10 feet up and the highest height listed, 4.48 meters, is close to 15 feet above the water. More on how we figured those numbers out in the next section, but thought you might like to know.
How fast is she moving? The diver starts at 3 meters, which is the height of the springboard, and 0.2 seconds later she’s up to 3.88 meters. That means during the first 0.2 seconds, the diver went up
\begin{equation*}
3.88-3 = 0.88 \text{ meters}
\end{equation*}
Her speed is
\begin{equation*}
\frac{0.88 \text{ meters}}{0.2 \text{ seconds}} = 0.88 \div 0.2 = 4.4 \text{ meters/sec}
\end{equation*}
What about during the next 0.2 seconds? Does she move faster, slower, or the same? During this time, her height changed from 3.88 meters to 4.38 meters. In these 0.2 seconds she rose
\begin{equation*}
4.38-3.88 = 0.50 \text{ meters}
\end{equation*}
That’s less than before (since \(0.50 < 0.88\)), which means she is going slower. Let’s double check by calculating her speed.
\begin{equation*}
\frac{0.50 \text{ meters}}{0.2 \text{ seconds}} = 0.50 \div 0.2 = 2.5 \text{ meters/sec}
\end{equation*}
Yup, slower.
Let’s take a look at this calculation again. Here’s what we did.
\begin{equation*}
\text{speed} = \frac{4.38-3.88 \text{ meters}}{0.4-0.2 \text{ seconds}} = \frac{0.50 \text{ meters}}{0.2 \text{ seconds}} = 0.50 \div 0.2 = 2.5 \text{ meters/sec}
\end{equation*}
There is a way to do the entire calculation at once on your calculator.
\begin{equation*}
(4.38-3.88) \div (0.4-0.2)=2.5 \text{ meters/sec}
\end{equation*}
See how we put parentheses around both the top and bottom of the fraction? We needed them to force the calculator to do the subtractions first and division second. The usual order of operations would do it the other way around: multiplication and division before addition and subtraction. (If you need a reminder, the full list of the
order of operations is discussed in
Section 0.4.) Because the top and bottom of the fraction each have meaning in the story, we continue to calculate them separately, but feel free to do the whole calculation at once if you prefer.
Notice that we are subtracting like terms: meters from meters and then seconds from seconds. It would not make sense to mix. Think:
\begin{equation*}
\text{children} - \text{cookies} = \text{crying}
\end{equation*}
so we don’t want to mix units because that would be like taking cookies away from children.
In our story, we calculated the speed of the diver. In general, that number is the rate of change of the function over that interval of values.
Rate of Change Formula
\begin{equation*}
\text{rate of change } = \frac{\text{change dep}}{\text{change indep}} = \frac{\text{1st dep - 2nd dep}}{\text{1st indep - 2nd indep}}
\end{equation*}
Notice how the change in dependent variable (height, in meters) is on top of the fraction and the change in independent variable (time, in seconds) is on the bottom. That makes sense in our example because speed is measured in meters/second. The units can help you keep that straight.
\begin{equation*}
\text{units for rate of change} = \frac{\text{units for dep}}{\text{units for indep}}
\end{equation*}
Back to our diver. During the next time interval she’s moving even slower.
\begin{equation*}
\text{speed} = \frac{4.48-4.38 \text{ meters}}{0.6-0.4 \text{ seconds}}= \frac{0.1 \text{ meters}}{0.2 \text{ seconds}} = 0.1 \div 0.2 = 0.5 \text{ meters/sec.}
\end{equation*}
And look what happens when we calculate her speed during the next time interval.
\begin{equation*}
\text{speed} = \frac{4.20-4.48 \text{ meters}}{0.8-0.6 \text{ seconds}} = \frac{-0.28 \text{ meters}}{0.2 \text{ seconds}} = \text{(-)}0.28 \div 0.2 = -1.4 \text{ meters/sec}
\end{equation*}
What does a negative speed mean? During this time interval her height drops. She’s headed down towards the water. Her speed is 1.4 meters/sec downward. The negative tells us her height is falling. What goes up, must come down. Sure enough.
You may notice that the sign − used for subtraction and - used for negation look very similar. On the calculator these are two different keys. The subtraction key reads just -. The negation key often reads (-) and is done before the number. This does not mean you type in parentheses, just hit the key that is labeled (-) already. (If your calculator does not have a key labeled (-), look for a key labeled +/- instead. That is not three keys, just one labeled +/-. To emphasize that it is one key, we just write ±. Often that key needs to follow the number, so enter
\begin{equation*}
0.28\pm \div 0.2 =
\end{equation*}
You should get -1.4 meters/sec again.
Here are the speeds included in our table.
\(T\) |
0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
\(H\) |
3 |
3.88 |
4.38 |
4.48 |
4.2 |
3.52 |
2.45 |
1 |
Speed |
|
4.4 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
-1.4 |
-3.4 |
-5.35 |
-7.25 |
|
Let’s graph our function. Notice that time is on the horizontal axis because it’s the independent variable and height is on the vertical axis because it’s our dependent variable: height depends on time.
As usual we drew in a smooth curve connecting the points, which illustrates our best guesses for the points we don’t know and we continued the graph until the height was zero (when the diver hits the water). The values from our table are indicated with big points to help explain what’s going on.
There is a way to see the rate of change from the graph. In the case of our diver, the graph looks like a hill. The curve goes uphill at first. Between the first two points it is rather steep and the rate of change is 4.4 meters/sec there. The next segment is less steep and that’s where the rate of change is less, down to 2.5 meters/sec. The third line segment is almost flat and that’s where the rate of change is only 0.5 meters/sec. Aha. The rate of change corresponds to how steep the curve is.
We notice the same connection between the rate of change and steepness of the curve for the downhill portion, only this time all the rates of change are negative. The first downhill segment is not very steep and the rate of change is -1.4 meters/sec there. The next downhill segment has rate of change -3.4 meters/sec and the graph is steeper. The next two downhill segments are steeper and steeper yet and this time with rates of change -5.35 and -7.25 meters/sec.
A little more vocabulary here. For the uphill portion of the graph, from 0 to just before 0.6 seconds, the rate of change is positive. The function is increasing there: as the independent variable gets larger, so does the dependent variable. After about 0.6 seconds, the graph is downhill and the rate of change is negative. The function is decreasing there: as the independent variable gets larger, the dependent variable gets smaller.
When does the diver’s height stop increasing and start decreasing? When she’s at the highest height, some time just before 0.6 seconds into her dive. Before then her rate of change is positive. After that time her rate of change is negative. So, at the highest height her rate of change is probably equal to zero. Does that make sense? Think about watching a diver on film in very slow motion. Up, up she goes, then almost a pause at the top, and then down, down, into the water. At the top of her dive it’s as if she stands still for an instant. That would correspond to zero speed.